A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out concerning possible neighbours more than the construction of the wall in a coastal website in a very north Dublin suburb, a case that has attracted nationwide focus following an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed relatives house at Sutton Strand, where allegations of setting up breaches, environmental worries, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Periods write-up about René Collier as well as the Irish Situations write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has developed into a very publicised legal struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above development performs at the website on Dublin Street, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a company director respectively, seek to create their spouse and children residence. The situation has grown to be emblematic of wider disputes together Eire’s coastline, the place development pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of set up inhabitants. Based on the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting made by their possible neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted below arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally inhabitants of Dublin Highway, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their preparing permission by building a wall further than the boundaries in their website, bringing about an encroachment on the Distinctive Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result parts are topic to demanding controls below European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have lasting ecological effects, especially in a very delicate coastal setting including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach of their planning permission, and say the wall, and that is partially developed, is in the right position. Their lawful workforce has characterised the motion being an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The pair accuse litigants of looking for to halt homebuilding to be able to protect their watch, an allegation which has been recurring in court docket and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal setting up disputes, in which sights of The ocean are both equally very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular efforts with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the site, As outlined by sworn proof referenced from the Irish Periods. In one account, Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-high drinking water during a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Instances, a picture which includes considering that develop into emblematic from the depth from the dispute. These actions were not basically symbolic; they have been intended to Obtain visual proof from the wall’s place relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning within the sea Irish Periods described, describing how The 2 Males entered the water throughout serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm h2o to photograph the internet site grew to become Just about the most striking descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Instances post about accountant Paul Feely observed that this kind of steps had been cited to show the plaintiffs’ belief which the wall prolonged into a location impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached upon.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were included in detail by the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Moments 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 became widely searched phrases as audience sought to know the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to even more submissions on whether or not interim orders really should be granted to halt building pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential instant during the lawful timeline.
For the Main with the dispute is often a disagreement in excess of boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage the wall, as made, goes past what was accredited and intrudes into protected land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, has been referred to as meticulous in his examination of scheduling documents, maps, and ailments hooked up towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two pressured that their motion is enthusiastic by worry for environmental defense and adherence to planning law. They reject claims that the case is about preserving A non-public perspective, insisting as an alternative that it is about making certain that advancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've explained their lengthy-standing link to the region and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a pair only seeking to make a spouse and children home in accordance with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches over a Special Place of Conservation and say that all functions are actually carried out dependant on Specialist guidance and accepted options. Their legal professionals have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as coming into the sea in the course of a storm, don't change the underlying points.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how arranging disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours Paul Feely in bitter courtroom dispute above construction of wall at coastal internet site is becoming a shorthand description for the scenario that numerous observers see as progressively typical. As sea stages rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation amongst non-public land, public foreshore, and protected habitats has become a lot more contentious.
The Irish Situations posting about René Collier mentioned which the businessman had Beforehand been linked to regional advocacy on arranging and environmental concerns, though not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Situations report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from incredibly unique Skilled backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have grown to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from the sea Irish Periods coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of waist-substantial h2o all through a storm to photograph the site Irish Times and René Collier waded as a result of midsection-high h2o through a storm to photograph the location Irish Times are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting each the Bodily fact from the coastline and also the symbolic character of your act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these steps shown commitment; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an too much technique.
As being the High Court proceedings continue on, the result stays uncertain. The courtroom will have to determine whether the wall as designed complies with preparing authorization and no matter whether any encroachment into a Distinctive Area of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and setting up situations. But the human element stays central: neighbours who should live along with one another very long once the legal costs are actually paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than development is effective at the positioning on Dublin Highway, Sutton, though the implications of the situation extend over and above that deal with. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. Additionally, it underscores how swiftly a local disagreement can escalate when basic issues for example environmental security and residence legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be an area of purely natural natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre of the dispute stands partially created, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful issues. No matter if it is going to in the end be altered, eradicated, or finished as prepared will rely on the court docket’s conclusions. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will very likely go on to appear in headlines, joined indelibly to Probably the most intently watched preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent years.